Mapping Tribal and Gender Gaps in India’s Just Sustainability Transitions: A Research Gap Matrix Analysis

Volume 11, Issue 2, 2026

International Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, ISSN 2456-3684

Paper Title

Mapping Tribal and Gender Gaps in India’s Just Sustainability Transitions: A Research Gap Matrix Analysis

Author Name and Affiliation

Dr. Kanchan Kumari

Assistant Professor, Gitarattan International Business School, Affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, India. Email: prof.kanchan30@gmail.com / fdp25b1kanchank@alumni.iimidr.ac.in

Abstract

India’s pursuit of decarbonisation, water and food security, and climate resilience is frequently framed through the language of ‘just transition’ yet it remains unclear whether the underlying research base actually engages the population groups most exposed to transition-related disruption. This article uses a systematic evidence-mapping technique, a three-dimensional research gap matrix cross-tabulating Population Group, Outcome Domain, and Sustainability Transition type to examine how Tribal/Native tribes communities and gender are represented in the literature on just sustainability transitions in India. Of 156 evidence entries coded across ten population categories, ten outcome domains, and nine transition types (plus a residual ‘Not Specified’ category), zero entries were coded to Tribal/Native tribes or Women/Gender populations across any outcome or transition combination, while 133 entries (85.3 percent) could not be attributed to any specific population group at all. Three transition types, biodiversity/land use, waste/circular economy, and transport, returned zero evidence irrespective of population, and the Livelihood/Employment outcome domain returned zero evidence system-wide. The findings suggest that Indian just-transition scholarship remains dominated by generic, non-disaggregated framing, leaving both Native tribes communities and women structurally invisible in outcome-linked, transition-specific evidence, despite qualitative and policy literature documenting substantial impacts on both groups. The article situates these findings within just sustainability and energy justice theory, and proposes a research agenda that foregrounds disaggregated, intersectional evidence generation as a precondition for equitable transition policy.

Keywords

Just Sustainability Transitions, Tribal/Native tribes Communities, Gender and Energy Justice, Evidence Gap Mapping, India; Research Disaggregation

References

  • Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (2003). Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Avelino, F., Wijsman, K., van Steenbergen, F., Jhagroe, S., Wittmayer, J., Akerboom, S., Bogner, K., Jansen, E. F., Frantzeskaki, N., & Kalfagianni, A. (2024). Just Sustainability Transitions: Politics, Power, and Prefiguration in Transformative Change toward Justice and Sustainability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49(1), 519–547.
  • Cellini, M., Loos, S., Mirenda, C., Pisacane, L., Striebing, C., & Tagliacozzo, S. (2025). Exploring the Nexus of Gender and Energy Transitions: A Systematic Literature Review. Energy Research & Social Science, 119, 103887.
  • Down To Earth. (2025). Degendering India’s Green Transition: How Renewable Energy Policies Deepen Women’s Burdens. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.
  • iFOREST (International Forum for Environment, Sustainability & Technology). (2022). Korba: Planning a Just Transition for India’s Biggest Coal and Power District. New Delhi: iFOREST.
  • IMPRI (Impact and Policy Research Institute). (2025). Empowering Women in India’s Energy Transition: Bridging the Gender Gap through Policy and Technology. New Delhi: IMPRI.
  • Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182.
  • Kumar, M. (2023). Violent Transitions: Towards a Political Ecology of Coal and Hydropower in India. Climate and Development. Advance online publication.
  • McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just Transition: Integrating Climate, Energy and Environmental Justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1–7.
  • NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). (2024). Women’s Leadership in India’s Equitable Energy Transition. Washington, DC: NRDC.
  • NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). (2025). People behind the Transition: An Update on Workforce and Gender in India’s Renewable Energy Story. Washington, DC: NRDC.
  • Ordonez, J. A., Jakob, M., Steckel, J. C., & Ward, H. (2023). India’s Just Energy Transition: Political Economy Challenges across States and Regions. Energy Policy, 179, 113621.
  • Pandey, J. G., & Kumar, A. (2025). Navigating India’s Energy Transition: A Systematic Literature Review of Risks in the Coal Phase-Down Process. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 210, 115260.
  • Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Swarnakar, P., & Singh, M. K. (2022). Local Governance in Just Energy Transition: Towards a Community-Centric Framework. Sustainability, 14(11), 6495.
  • TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute). (2023). Just Transition Framework for a Sustainable Future in India’s Coal Mining Regions. New Delhi: TERI.
  • TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute). (2025). WSDS 2025 Thematic Track: Putting Gender at the Heart of India’s Clean Energy Transition. New Delhi: TERI.
  • Xaxa, V. (2022). Tribal Development in Fifth Schedule Areas: Affirmative Action or Unequal Exchange? In A. Xaxa & G. Devy (Eds.), Being Native tribes: Existence, Entitlements, Exclusion (pp. 15–34). Gurugram: Penguin Random House India.

DOI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.67061/ijcams.2026.vol.11.issue.02.8091

Download PDF

Copyright © 2020 IJCAMS - All rights reserved. Use of this website signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions IJCAMS