Impact of Investment Planning on Employees’ Perceived Retirement Preparedness

Volume 11, Issue 3, 2026

International Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, ISSN 2456-3684

Paper Title

Impact of Investment Planning on Employees’ Perceived Retirement Preparedness

Author Name and Affiliation

Dr. Sahifa Moosa Muradbi Mazgaonkar

Department of Accountancy, L. Dahanukar College of Commerce (Autonomous), Dixit Road, Vile Parle East, Mumbai

Email: sahifar0402@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyses the impact of Diversification of Investments, Risk Appetite in Investment Decisions and Retirement Benefits Provided by Employer on employees’ Perceived Retirement Preparedness. Because corporate employees increasingly have more freedom in implementing their investment strategies as opposed to the traditional pension systems, examining determinants affecting the confidence of financial preparation for old age would be necessary in order to take informed decisions and take informed policies.

Design/Methodology/Approach: The quantitative research methodology was adopted using the multiple regression technique to examine the association of investment planning factors with perceived retirement preparedness. The research was conducted on 684 corporate employees from a suburban area of Mumbai by using simple random sampling design. Then, regression analysis and assumption verification were performed to confirm the statistical significance of the independent variables.

Findings: The findings indicate that Investment Diversification (B =. 211, t = 4.499, P =. 000), and the Level of Risk Appetite in Investment Decisions (B =. 188, t = 4.211, P < .001); and Retirement Benefits Provided by Employer (B =. 331, t = 6.275, P <.001) have a strong and positive effect on Perceived Retirement Preparedness. The regression model F (3, 680) = 53.204, p <.001, R² = .190) accounts for 19% of the variance in Perceived Retirement Preparedness, suggesting the role of these investment-related factors in influencing perceptions of financial confidence towards retirement.

Originality/Value: This study offers empirical support for the role of workers’ investment choices and employer benefits in influencing retirement security. Implications The results add to the existing academic debate on financial preparedness and provide practical implications for those working in corporate employers, policy makers and financial advisors in developing measures to enhance financial literacy and retirement savings. This research contributes to understanding effective financial planning by recognizing important investment behaviours that will lead to long-term financial stability for employees.

Keywords

Investment Diversification, Risk Appetite, Retirement Preparedness, Retirement Benefits Provided by Employer

References

  • Akben-Selcuk, E., & Aydin, A. E. (2021). Ready or not, here it comes: A model of perceived financial preparedness for retirement. Journal of Adult Development28(4), 346-357.
  • Clark, R. L., Morrill, M. S., & Allen, S. G. (2009). Employer-provided retirement planning programs.
  • Bobbitt, Z. (2021). The Durbin-Watson Test: Definition & Example.  com.
  • Clark, R. L. (2023). Effectiveness of employer-provided financial education programs. Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing1(1), 154-168.
  • Dhewa, C., Bonga, W. G., Mudondo, T., & Makurumidze, S. (2024). The Influence of Financial Literacy on Employee Retirement Preparedness. Dynamic Research Journals’ Journal of Economics & Finance9(3), 01-33.
  • DiCenzo, J. (2014). Employees’ retirement choices, perceptions and understanding: a review of selected survey and empirical behavioral decision-making research. Behavioural Research Associates, LLC and Society of Actuaries Working paper.
  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Murray, B. (2007). Retirement savings behavior of higher education employees. Research in Higher Education48, 545-582.
  • Frost, J. (2017). Choosing the correct type of regression analysis. Statistics By Jim.
  • Kim, J., Kwon, J., & Anderson, E. A. (2005). Factors related to retirement confidence: Retirement preparation and workplace financial education. Financial Counselling and Planning16(2), 77-89.
  • Kristal, T. (2017). Who gets and who gives employer-provided benefits? Evidence from matched employer-employee data. Social Forces96(1), 31-64.
  • Larisa, L. E., Njo, A., & Wijaya, S. (2020). Female workers’ readiness for retirement planning: evidence from Indonesia. Review of Behavioral Finance13(5), 566-583.
  • Lester, G. V., Brock Baskin, M. E., & Clinton, M. S. (2021). Employer-sponsored benefits in the United States: The past, present, and future. Compensation & Benefits Review53(1), 24-42.
  • Mastin, T. (1998). Employees’ understanding of employer-sponsored retirement plans, a knowledge gap perspective. Public Relations Review24(4), 521-534.
  • Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education7(2), 255-265.
  • Osborne, J. W. & Waters, E., (2002) “Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test”, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation8(1): 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/r222-hv23
  • Pendleton, A., & Robinson, A. (2018). Lack of diversification among employee stock owners: An empirical evaluation of behavioral explanations. Human Resource Management57(5), 1175-1187.
  • Power, M. L., Hobbs, J. M., & Ober, A. (2011). An empirical analysis of the effect of financial education on graduating business students’ perceptions of their retirement planning familiarity, motivation, and preparedness. Risk Management and Insurance Review14(1), 89-105.
  • Senaviratna, N. A. M. R., & Cooray, T. M. J. A. (2019). Diagnosing multicollinearity of logistic regression model. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics5(2), 1-9.
  • Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American journal of applied mathematics and statistics8(2), 39-42.
  • Stabile, S. J. (2002). Another Look at 401 (k) Plan Investments in Employer Securities, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 539 (2002). UIC Law Review35(4), 2.
  • Stolzenberg, R. M. (2004). Multiple regression analysis. Handbook of data analysis, 165-208.

DOI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.67061/ijcams.2026.vol.11.issue.03.8126

Download PDF

Copyright © 2020 IJCAMS - All rights reserved. Use of this website signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions IJCAMS